Deslocamentos contemporâneos e a utilização do fetichismo categórico migrante-refugiado na externalização da política migratória europeia: uma análise do fluxo migratório Tunísia-UE Uma análise do fluxo migratório Tunísia - União Européia
Barra lateral de artigos
Conteúdo do artigo principal
Resumo
O presente artigo visa discutir sobre a dimensão teórica-conceitual da externalização da política externa migratória europeia via Tunísia, se debruçando sobre a categorização migrante-refugiado como respaldo para ações de securitização das fronteiras do bloco. Explorada por meio de uma análise bibliográfica e documental, a hipótese aqui defendida é a de que a categorização dicotômica de deslocados forçados entre “migrantes” ou “refugiados”, ainda feita por parte da União Europeia (UE) no contexto contemporâneo dos fluxos migratórios, não é suficiente para elucidar completamente as complexas relações entre fatores políticos, econômicos e sociais que provocam o deslocamento de indivíduos. Mas não somente: por meio da análise do padrão comportamental da Frontex frente a Parceria Mobilizadora firmada entre a Tunísia e o bloco europeu após os deslocamentos da Primavera Árabe em 2011, demonstraremos como tal categorização de deslocados é utilizada como ferramenta pelo bloco na transformação da Tunísia em zona-tampão de migrações irregulares provenientes do Norte da África desde então. Desta forma, prova-se a tentativa europeia de se esquivar de obrigações legais de potenciais requerentes de asilo.
Downloads
Detalhes do artigo
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Referências
ANGENENDT, S; KOCH, A. Global migration governance and mixed flows: implications for development-centred policies. Berlin, Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik -SWP- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit, 2017.
APOSTOLOVA, R. Of Refugees and Migrants: Stigma, Politics, and Boundary Work at the Borders of Europe. American Sociological Association Newsletter, set/2014. Disponível em: https://asaculturesection.org/2015/09/14/of-refugees-and-migrants-stigma-politics-and-boundary-work-at-the-borders-of-europe/. Acesso em 21/03/2021.
BADALIČ, V. Tunisia’s Role in the EU External Migration Policy: Crimmigration Law, Illegal Practices, and Their Impact on Human Rights. Journal of International Migration and Integration, p. 85-100, jun. 2018.
BAKEWELL, O. Research Beyond the Categories: The Importance of Policy Irrelevant Research into Forced Migration. Journal of Refugee Studies, Oxford, v. 21, n. 4, p 432-453, ago. 2008.
BARTELS, I. Practices and Power of Knowledge Dissemination: International Organizations in the Externalization of Migration Management in Morocco and Tunisia. Movements: Journal for Critical Migration and Border Regime Studies, v. 4, p.47-66, jan. 2018.
BARTELS, I. Reconfiguration of Tunisian migration politics after the ‘Arab Spring’—The role of young civil society movements. In SCHAFER, I (Org.), Youth, revolt, recognition—The young generation during and after the “Arab Spring”. Berlin: Mediterranean Institute Berlin, pp. 62–79, 2015.
BICCHI, F. The Politics of Foreign Aid and the European Neighbourhood Policy Post-Arab Spring: “More for More” or Less of the Same? Mediterranean Politics, v. 19, n. 3, p. 318–332, nov/2014.
BOZORGMEHR, K. WAHEDI, K. Reframing solidarity in Europe: Frontex, frontiers, and the fallacy of refugee quota. Lancet Public Health, v. 2, n. 1, p. 10-11, nov/2016.
CAMPESI, G. Frontex, the Euro-Mediterranean border and the paradoxes of humanitarian rhetoric. South East European Journal of Political Science, v. II, n. 3, p. 126-134, 2014.
CARRERA, S; DEN HERTOG, L; PARKIN, J. EU Migration Policy in the wake of the Arab Spring: what prospects for EU-Southern Mediterranean Relations? MEDPRO Technical Report n. 15, ago. 2012.
CASSARINO, J.-P. Channelled Policy Transfers: EU-Tunisia Interactions on Migration Matters. European Journal of Migration and Law, v. 16, n. 1, p. 97–123, fev. 2014.
CHIMNI, B. S. The Birth of a ‘Discipline’: From Refugee to Forced Migration Studies. Journal of Refugee Studies, v. 22, n. 1, p. 11–29, mar. 2009.
CRAWLEY, H.; SKLEPARIS, D. Refugees, migrants, neither, both: categorical fetishism and the politics of bounding in Europe's 'migration crisis. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, v. 44, n. 1, p. 48-64, jul. 2017.
CUTTITA, P. Non-governmental/civil society organisations and the European Union-externalisation of migration management in Tunisia and Egypt. Popul Space Place, v. 26, n. 7, p. 1-13 fev. 2020.
DERDERIAN, K; SCHOCKAERT, L. Respostas a fluxos migratórios mistos: Uma perspectiva humanitária. Traduzido por Andre Degenszajn. Revista Sur, v. 6, n. 10, p. 106-119 São Paulo, jun. 2009.
ESTEVENS, J. Migration crisis in the EU: developing a framework for analysis of national security and defence strategies. Comparative Migration Studies, v. 6, n. 28, p. 1-21, out. 2018.
FINDLAY, A. M. Patterns and processes of Tunisian migration. 1980. Tese (Doutorado wem Geografia) – Departamento de Filosofia – Durham University, 1980.
GIGLIOLI, I. Producing Sicily as Europe: Migration, Colonialism and the Making of the Mediterranean Border between Italy and Tunisia. Geopolitics, v. 22, n. 2, p. 407–428, set. 2016.
GREENHILL, K. M. Open Arms Behind Barred Doors: Fear, Hypocrisy and Policy Schizophrenia in the European Migration Crisis. European Law Journal, v. 22 n. 3, p. 317–332, jun. 2016.
HAMMERSTAD, A. UNHCR and the Securitization of Forced Migration. In BETTS, A; LOESCHER, G. Refugees in International Relations. Oxford: Oxford University Press, p. 237-260, 2010.
HEYSE, L. Choosing the Lesser Evil: Understanding Decision Making in Humanitarian Aid NGOs. Hamshire: Ashgate, 2006.
KARATANI, R. How history separated refugee and migrant regimes: in search of their institutional origins. International Journal of Refugee Law, v. 17, n. 3 p. 517-541, set. 2005.
LIMAM, M; DEL SARTO, R. A. Periphery under Pressure: Morocco, Tunisia and the European Union’s Mobility Partnership on Migration. Borderlands, EUI RSCAS, 2015.
MARTÍN, I; BONFANTI, S. Migration and Asylum Challenges in Eastern Africa: Mixed Migration Flows Require Dual Policy Approaches. Migration Policy Centre, Policy Briefs, mar. 2015.
MOREIRA, J. Pesquisando migrantes forçados e refugiados: reflexões sobre desafios metodológicos no campo de estudos. Sociedade e Cultura, v. 20, n. 2, p. 154-172, jul/dez 2017.
NOUTCHEVA, G. Institutional Governance of European Neighbourhood Policy in the Wake of the Arab Spring. Journal of European Integration, v. 37, n. 1, p. 19–36, dez. 2014.
PASTORE, F; ROMAN, E. Framing migration in the southern Mediterranean: how do civil society actors evaluate EU migration policies? The case of Tunisia. Corporative Migration Studies, v. 8, n. 2, p. 2-22, jan. 2020.
STALKER, P. Migration Trends and Migration Policy in Europe. International Migration, v. 40, n. 5, p. 151-176, fev. 2013.
STOCK, I; ÜSTÜBICI, A; SCHULTZ, S. U. Externalization at work: responses to migration policies from the Global South. Comparative Migration Studies, v. 7, n. 48, set. 2019.
SPIEKER, H. The Right to Give and Receive Humanitarian Assistance. In HEINTZE, H-J; ZWITTER, A (Orgs.). International Law and Humanitarian Assistance: A Crosscut Through Legal Issues Pertaining to Humanitarianism.. Heidelberg: Springer, p. 7-32, 2011.
Van HEAR, N; BRUBAKER, R; BESSA, T. Managing mobility for human development: the growing salience of mixed migration. Human Development Research Paper, n. 20, p. 1-44, dez. 2009.
ZETTER, R. Protection in Crisis: Forced Migration and Protection in a Global Era. Washington, Migration Policy Institute, 2015.
ZIMMERMANN, K F. Tackling the European Migration Problem. Journal of Economic Perspectives, v. 9, n. 2, p. 45-62, primavera, 1995.
ZWITTER, A. et al. Humanitarian Action: Global, Regional and Domestic Legal Responses. Cambridge: Cambridge, 2014.